3 ms·

Do you think possibly they could make it optional and not turned on by default? Like maybe by requiring completely different keywords for concurrent vs non-con

• Groxx 3y ago
  I get the sarcasm, but I also run into many, many, many product-team-management and company-wide-infra-decision-making types that mandate concurrency when it is available, and slam it through regardless of the cost. With teams dominated by freshly-graduated-from-college engs. And loads of times that I've seen existing systems hit a performance bottleneck, and the solution was to relax consistency because it speeds up and the existing tests pass. Putting a loaded gun within reach of millions of people is less safe than not doing that.
  • valenterry 3y ago
    See it positive! I've known too many cases where NoSQL databases where forced upon developers because of HA and concurrency/performance. Now I can at least say "wait, there is concurrency in SQLite if we need it. No problem".
    • Groxx 3y ago
      Definitely agreed there. More SQLite is more good in my book.