> there can not be in LLM as it's just automated plagiarism without understanding anything. Conjecture. We lack a mechanistic understanding of "understanding",

> there can not be in LLM as it's just automated plagiarism without understanding anything. Conjecture. We lack a mechanistic understanding of "understanding", so you can't make this claim. Human answers are also fallible, so how do you know that human cognition isn't also statistical pattern matching similar to what's used in LLMs? If it is, then they are understanding, their understanding just has flaws.