> Competition is better than no competition. But Slack competed. It forced Microsoft to improve, then it lost. "Competition" doesn't mean artificially keep com

> Competition is better than no competition. But Slack competed. It forced Microsoft to improve, then it lost. "Competition" doesn't mean artificially keep competitors alive when they can't survive on their own. If Slack was that much better then we wouldn't be having this convo because companies would see the value and pay for it. The actual problem is that companies just aren't seeing that much value in Slack.