3 ms·
Anything thing that talks about "Before the Big Bang" isn't science. It may be philosophy or mathematical speculation, but it is not science.
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 3y ago
Anything thing that talks about "Before the Big Bang" isn't science. It may be philosophy or mathematical speculation, but it is not science.
- theguppydream 3y agoThere is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful article.
- Jevon23 3y agoOk? Not everything in the world has to be science. Some things are not science. It’s fine.
- digging 3y agoThis article is explicitly claiming to be science.
- philsquared_ 3y ago"Anything that talks about 'the world is round' isn't science. It may be astrology or mathematical speculation but it is not science."
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 3y agoOne can do experiments to empirically test the earth is round. There are no experiments one can do to empirically test things asserted before the Big Bang.
- philipov 3y agoWhile I agree with the sentiment here, Penrose has come up with a model that does make testable hypotheses about what happened before the big bang with his Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. Now, I think that as a matter of fact, the predictions he made have turned out to not be true, but at least he came up with a way to test them. If I recall correctly, the predictions had to do with patterns in the CMB that would have been left over from black holes in a universe before the big bang, and those patterns ended up not being there. It wasn't the right answer, but that's science.
- philsquared_ 3y ago"Dont hypothesize over anything that cannot be immediatly tested otherwise it isnt science" -rcouf1z4gsc
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 3y agoYeah testable hypothesis are what separate science from other disciplines. If you don’t have a testable hypothesis, you don’t have science