3 ms·
> As a happy MS Teams user Sounds like Stockholm syndrome. I was a moderately happy Teams user for conferencing before switching jobs to one that uses Zoom for
by sofixa 3y ago
> As a happy MS Teams user
Sounds like Stockholm syndrome. I was a moderately happy Teams user for conferencing before switching jobs to one that uses Zoom for conferencing, but occasionally has to use Teams.. it's not even close.
Teams was, and still is, a crapshot if it will mangle my audio settings or not (browser, Ubuntu, macOS, doesn't matter). Camera touch-up is pathetic compared to what Zoom does (I have conflicting natural light). Oh, and logging in is often a pain with a million redirects left and right, a timeout from times to times, etc. Also, sometimes I just can't connect to a meeting, it will keep spinning forever, and I have to use the browser version which has the fun benefit of not having all features (sometimes the chat just isn't there on the browser while it is on the "native" "app").
- bombcar 3y agoI think a big part of it is if people use teams mainly as a video calling tool vs a chat tool vs a multiplayer Office tool.
- Spare_account 3y agoI wonder if there is a pattern here that people who are complaining about MS Teams are also largely non-Windows users? My company is almost exclusively made up of Windows users and overall, I don't hear many complaints about MS Teams.