3 ms·
It's far more work to do what they currently do which is nitpick the things they don't like to remove/disable/replace them. Increasing divergence is a benefit
by gochi 3y ago
It's far more work to do what they currently do which is nitpick the things they don't like to remove/disable/replace them.
Increasing divergence is a benefit for them here, but the main concern with chromium forks isn't the effort required it's the lack of coherent vision. Except for maybe Arc, but that's closed source, the rest of them feel like chrome but dirtier. Giant bing buttons, crypto wallets, new tab ads, it's absurd how much of them are willing to sacrifice the user experience. To the point where I can understand why a user would just stick with chrome despite what they're doing.
- kaba0 3y agoCan they implement some new web standard in a shifted away codebase? Or fix a zero day? You seem to vastly underestimate the complexity of a browser engine. Just letting it stay afloat is a huge task in itself — remember, Microsoft itself decided against doing so. They can maintain a soft fork, but from a much smaller company, it is not a trivial feat at all.