> "free money for everyone, whats the problem, we don't really need to work?!" don't seem to understand that someone has to do the work you're avoiding, or else

> "free money for everyone, whats the problem, we don't really need to work?!" don't seem to understand that someone has to do the work you're avoiding, or else things don't progress. No they don't. If this was the case, salaries would be low across the board, instead there's an ever increasing wealth inequality. There are a lot of people with jobs because of organizational inefficiencies. Lots of people that are there for that one to two hours of work because it falls into a weird area that can't be assigned to someone else. And the company doesn't give a shit if these people did a lot more - if they did, they pay them to do it. Starbucks doesn't care if the manager walks in and cleans tables to a mirror shine every ten minutes, they care that it's clean and that all managers as a whole are following a protocol of wiping things down every hour.