4 ms·
Thank you for the knowledgeable reply. This choice will still render a ton of devices basically e-waste for no real good reason
by Knee_Pain 3y ago
Thank you for the knowledgeable reply.
This choice will still render a ton of devices basically e-waste for no real good reason
- BSEdlMMldESB 3y agoyou're calling the bottom line of hardware manufacturers "no good reason"!
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoWell... yes? Hardware can be very much bottom of the barrel and still be perfectly serviceable.
- Peaches4Rent 3y agoIt was sarcasm
- sofixa 3y ago> TPM 1.2 uses SHA1 for everything which is a broken hash function > No reason Using broken encryption is quite a decent reason.
- AshamedCaptain 3y agoDefinitely not for the actual user of the device.
- raxxorraxor 3y agoSHA1 is not for encryption, it is a signature algorithm. It is considered broken because there is a faster way than simple brute force to create a collision. The currently know approach is still computationally expensive. It is correct to call it broken, but I don't see the implications for TMP at all. TPM is shitty tech in the first place in my opinion, but aside from that there is little practical relevance.