3 ms·

I don't think 1.x was trained on porn either? I seem to remember the issue with 2.x is that they removed all the commercial art from top-notch illustrators fro

I don't think 1.x was trained on porn either? I seem to remember the issue with 2.x is that they removed all the commercial art from top-notch illustrators from the training data due to the backlash, so it was just way worse at generating great-looking things, which is all the user cares about. So the community stayed on their custom-trained models derived from SD 1.5 (which, yes, often included porn).

Auracle 3y ago
2.0 included a filter on the training data that removed all nudity. It went way too far and removed a lot of humans. They tried to rectify it a bit with 2.1 but even that was still hampered. What you said also happened, but the main thing was the base model didn't have a great concept of human anatomy. Apparently it was really hard to train for anything else as well.