4 ms·
Mandatory filtering/blocking seems pretty unconstitutional to me, which is just one example.
by NuSkooler 3y ago
Mandatory filtering/blocking seems pretty unconstitutional to me, which is just one example.
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoWould you rather have Chrome permit everyone to visit every phishing site? Not OK to take down C2 or botnets? Like it when a DDOS crushes your favorite website because Akamai and Cloudflare can't blackhole the traffic? Your ISP can't filter SMB ports, so everyone with Windows File Sharing gets pwned?
- tpxl 3y agoI would rather have governments punish criminals operating phishing sites, C2 and botnets, since, you know, it's _illegal_.
- ourmandave 3y agoI'm sure the Russian, Chinese, and North Korean govts will get right on that.
- tpxl 3y agoPerhaps if malicious countries are engaging in cybercrime in your country, you should disconnect them from your countries internet/phone connections. This would get them to behave right quick or suffer the effects of sanctions. It ain't perfect, but it's better than saying "there's nothing we can do, dude".
- WarOnPrivacy 3y agoFiltering/blocking would depend on the deployment. Lots of potential there tho. Can you offer any examples of a GA advocating for something that is fairly clearly unconstitutional? Utah has recently passed some boneheaded laws that certainly qualify. A GA advocating for one them would be a sound example.