4 ms·
Eh it’s not a huge deal with stable diffusion because you can inpaint. So you mask out the bad hands and generate a few dozen iterations that merge perfectly wi
by wincy 3y ago
Eh it’s not a huge deal with stable diffusion because you can inpaint. So you mask out the bad hands and generate a few dozen iterations that merge perfectly with the rest of the image. You’re bound to get something that looks good.
With SD2.1 I’d generate 100 or so images using inpainting and the “good fingers” was about 1% hit rate. If it’s up to 10% that’d be great because generating 10 images takes just a few seconds on an A100