That a bit oversimplifies the complex issue of animal sentience and our ethical responsibility, reducing it to absurdities. The crux isn't interfering with nat

That a bit oversimplifies the complex issue of animal sentience and our ethical responsibility, reducing it to absurdities. The crux isn't interfering with natural predation but acknowledging our role in unnecessary, large scale animal suffering, which differs from the survival driven ecological balance in nature. As people who can make ethical choices, we should choose to act to reduce unnecessary animal suffering and environmental destruction. Btw, dogs are omnivores and can thrive on plant-based diets tailored to their needs, while cats are obligate carnivores and require meat to avoid suffering and live healthily. Our carnivorous pets consume 25% of our meat production, so if someone is really concerned about meat consumption, they should consider another companion, such as a rabbit or a guinea pig.