3 ms·
Unicode is not a SNAFU. Though the UC has made mistakes here and there, the complexity of Unicode is only a mirror of the complexity of human scripts. Please
by cryptonector 3y ago
Unicode is not a SNAFU. Though the UC has made mistakes here and there, the complexity of Unicode is only a mirror of the complexity of human scripts.
Please stop taking dumps on Unicode. It does nothing for actually getting it implemented and implemented well.
- meepmorp 3y agoSeriously, the zoo of text encodings that reigned before widespread Unicode uptake was a pain the ass once you had data that went beyond 7 bits, especially for non-Roman scripts.
- josefx 3y ago> the complexity of Unicode is only a mirror of the complexity of human scripts. Oh please, Unicode didn't start out as an encoding covering human scripts - it was too late for that. It started out as an encoding to end all already existing encodings and that was a shit show with all kinds of weird and non printable symbols to begin with. It also didn't get better when Unicode started to add all kinds of shit like combining emojis into the mix.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cryptonector 3y ago> Unicode didn't start out as an encoding covering human scripts > It started out as an encoding to end all already existing encodings And those other encodings were encodings for a variety of human scripts. Re: emojis, well, they're not that different from Kanjis, not really -- both are pictographs after all, one just has much more modern functionality (e.g., color).
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]