3 ms·

I've seen people say this, but I've not actually observed that at all. What got censored exactly? Personally I feel I got to know everything in proper time as

I've seen people say this, but I've not actually observed that at all. What got censored exactly? Personally I feel I got to know everything in proper time as knowledge was being formed and refined. I think it might be because I know how to read papers and understand nuances? And the average person take policies as the same as high confidence proven scientific conclusions, as opposed to the best guess of the time by some policymaker that needs to make a decision without the full information?

ajsnigrutin 3y ago
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/world/coronavirus-who-masks-recommendation-trnd/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/world/coronavirus-who-mas... > “There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly,” Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO health emergencies program, said at a media briefing in Geneva, Switzerland, on Monday. This was a clear recommendation to not wear masks (unless you're caring for sick people), and overnight it turned to mandatory masks. This is not some random person somewhere, but someone who has to say stuff directly to "average people".
StuntPope 3y ago
> I've seen people say this, but I've not actually observed that at all. > What got censored exactly? Zerohedge was kicked off Twitter for suggesting that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was a likely candidate for the origin. We're seeing that Fauci & Ecohealth co-ordinated the paper to "debunk" the lab leak theory and now the lab leak is looking to be the most likely culprit (it is not without precedent, the 1977 Russian Flu turned out to be a lab leak from gain-on-function research). Ivermectin, was another. Complete with "horse de-wormer" smears and deplatforming campaigns all over the place. If you don't know of any instances where this has happened, you either did a masterful job tuning it all out, or still believe 99% of the b/s.
- esquivalience 3y ago
  Can you please post a source for the ivermectin point? If I understand your comment you're suggesting that it is effective against covid, but I may be misunderstanding.
  - StuntPope 3y ago
    Are you asking for a source on "ivermectin is not a horse de-wormer" Other than that it has been an FDA approved drug for over thirty years? Or are you asking for a source on somebody getting deplatformed for saying that, and Dr. Peter McCullough comes to mind there. The Great Barrington Declaration was also de-indexed from Google for disputing lockdowns.
    - esquivalience 3y ago
      For the point I mentioned when I asked about it
maeil 3y ago
Mentioning a lab leak as being worth considering was effectively banned on multiple major platforms for a long period.
- ajsnigrutin 3y ago
  Yep, and people are still banned, even when this theory started being discussed by "mainsteam experts" on mainstream media.

ajsnigrutin 3y ago

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/world/coronavirus-who-masks-recommendation-trnd/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/world/coronavirus-who-mas... > “There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly,” Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO health emergencies program, said at a media briefing in Geneva, Switzerland, on Monday. This was a clear recommendation to not wear masks (unless you're caring for sick people), and overnight it turned to mandatory masks. This is not some random person somewhere, but someone who has to say stuff directly to "average people".

StuntPope 3y ago

> I've seen people say this, but I've not actually observed that at all. > What got censored exactly? Zerohedge was kicked off Twitter for suggesting that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was a likely candidate for the origin. We're seeing that Fauci & Ecohealth co-ordinated the paper to "debunk" the lab leak theory and now the lab leak is looking to be the most likely culprit (it is not without precedent, the 1977 Russian Flu turned out to be a lab leak from gain-on-function research). Ivermectin, was another. Complete with "horse de-wormer" smears and deplatforming campaigns all over the place. If you don't know of any instances where this has happened, you either did a masterful job tuning it all out, or still believe 99% of the b/s.

esquivalience 3y ago
Can you please post a source for the ivermectin point? If I understand your comment you're suggesting that it is effective against covid, but I may be misunderstanding.
- StuntPope 3y ago
  Are you asking for a source on "ivermectin is not a horse de-wormer" Other than that it has been an FDA approved drug for over thirty years? Or are you asking for a source on somebody getting deplatformed for saying that, and Dr. Peter McCullough comes to mind there. The Great Barrington Declaration was also de-indexed from Google for disputing lockdowns.
  - esquivalience 3y ago
    For the point I mentioned when I asked about it

maeil 3y ago

Mentioning a lab leak as being worth considering was effectively banned on multiple major platforms for a long period.

ajsnigrutin 3y ago
Yep, and people are still banned, even when this theory started being discussed by "mainsteam experts" on mainstream media.