> And as we know they're the only countries with radar and observation abilities. They're not? Are you implying that by pointing out one event I'm explicitly e

> And as we know they're the only countries with radar and observation abilities. They're not? Are you implying that by pointing out one event I'm explicitly excluding the possibility of others? Not sure that follows. > This is nothing new. There's plenty of "stuff" that can get tagged as a UAP/UFO/Whatever. None of it has turned out to be aliens. Depends on who you ask, which was kin of my entire point. There is tons of evidence, what missing is provenance. > We've also got reports of dragons, krakens, bigfoot, the lochness, ghosts, psychic powers, and magic. Hell there's a couple of rather popular books talking about all sorts of phenomena like talking burning bushes, parting the sea, and walking on water. Again, the was my point. I wasn't saying "here is all the 100% proven evidence". I was saying "there is no evidence" is an inaccurate statement. > No, it just isn't. HARD EVIDENCE does not exist There is plenty of material, with plenty of seals of approval, just not from the U.S. gov.