4 ms·

> Their influence was organic. Today's music trends are forced. This is 100% purestrain revisionism.

• samstave 3y ago
  Uh, I had to goog this... but this doesnt map. So explain thyself ;; " this involve a significant revision of fundamental Marxist theories and premises, and usually involve making an alliance with the bourgeois class " - uh... explain me... to me?
  • bigbillheck 3y ago
    Your understanding of the music industry of the 60s and 70s is at the 'not even wrong' level. Let's start with this to set the context: > But we dont have revolutionary music such as led zepplin, pink floyd, etc in the current crop. And then when it comes to Led Zeppelin and this: > none of the above sought facade public images as much as every single 'influencing' pop-stars today. I'm not sure what 'facade' is doing there, maybe you meant to use a different word, but I'm also not sure how you can look at Led Zeppelin after the early 70s and say they weren't seeking a public image. Then there's Pink Floyd and this: > Their influence was organic. Today's music trends are forced. From which I'm going to guess that you've never actually listened to the lyrics to 'Have a Cigar'.
    • samstave 3y ago
      im open to hearing ypour thoughts