3 ms·

I'm talking about psychedelics used recreationally, although I know from personal experience how valuable they can be in sorting out personal internal problems.

I'm talking about psychedelics used recreationally, although I know from personal experience how valuable they can be in sorting out personal internal problems. Also, a psychedelics deficiency won't kill you unlike insulin.

LoganDark 3y ago
Yet a psychedelics overdose can absolutely kill you, even if you ordered something safe* (like LSD) and it turned out to be something dangerous like NBOMe instead. Which happens because these drugs haven't been legalized yet, so you can't buy them from known, vetted sources - no sources on the dark web are known or vetted. *there have currently been no known deaths from LSD overdoses, even for people who took tens of milligrams (which is tens of thousands of times higher than a normal recreational dose), but there are still plenty of deaths from irresponsible actions while on LSD, and plenty more cases of people surviving but still getting absolutely fucked mentally.
- _a_a_a_ 3y ago
  I said "a psychedelics deficiency won't kill you unlike insulin". Deficiency, I said. So why are you talking about overdose. Obviously an overdose of anything will kill you, including water, so what was your point.
  - LoganDark 3y ago
    > Deficiency, I said. So why are you talking about overdose. ...I was trying to add to your point because you were basically saying something along the lines of "there is no condition that requires someone to take psychedelics" and I wanted to add "plus taking psychedelics can be risky because it's easy to overdose" (which it absolutely is if you don't get the product you ordered, which is unfortunately quite common). I'm so dumbfounded by this argument I can't even explain what I find wrong with it, sorry.
    - _a_a_a_ 3y ago
      > you were basically saying something along the lines of "there is no condition that requires someone to take psychedelics" Not that I was saying that but ok, is there one? Edit: I'm sorry, this conversation has just gone in a very odd way and I don't know how or why. Pretty sure we got wires crossed again. Anyways, no offence.
      - LoganDark 3y ago
        > Not that I was saying that but ok, is there one? no, I was trying to agree with you.

LoganDark 3y ago

Yet a psychedelics overdose can absolutely kill you, even if you ordered something safe* (like LSD) and it turned out to be something dangerous like NBOMe instead. Which happens because these drugs haven't been legalized yet, so you can't buy them from known, vetted sources - no sources on the dark web are known or vetted. *there have currently been no known deaths from LSD overdoses, even for people who took tens of milligrams (which is tens of thousands of times higher than a normal recreational dose), but there are still plenty of deaths from irresponsible actions while on LSD, and plenty more cases of people surviving but still getting absolutely fucked mentally.

_a_a_a_ 3y ago
I said "a psychedelics deficiency won't kill you unlike insulin". Deficiency, I said. So why are you talking about overdose. Obviously an overdose of anything will kill you, including water, so what was your point.
- LoganDark 3y ago
  > Deficiency, I said. So why are you talking about overdose. ...I was trying to add to your point because you were basically saying something along the lines of "there is no condition that requires someone to take psychedelics" and I wanted to add "plus taking psychedelics can be risky because it's easy to overdose" (which it absolutely is if you don't get the product you ordered, which is unfortunately quite common). I'm so dumbfounded by this argument I can't even explain what I find wrong with it, sorry.
  - _a_a_a_ 3y ago
    > you were basically saying something along the lines of "there is no condition that requires someone to take psychedelics" Not that I was saying that but ok, is there one? Edit: I'm sorry, this conversation has just gone in a very odd way and I don't know how or why. Pretty sure we got wires crossed again. Anyways, no offence.
    - LoganDark 3y ago
      > Not that I was saying that but ok, is there one? no, I was trying to agree with you.