If Zig does not have a |*const item| syntax, maybe adding it would be a good idea (and also satisfy your concern)? (Zig already has a concept of mutable and co

If Zig does not have a |*const item| syntax, maybe adding it would be a good idea (and also satisfy your concern)? (Zig already has a concept of mutable and const pointers.) For example, in C++ I would distinguish between mutating iteration and non-mutating iteration like this: for (const auto& item : collection) {} // non-mutating for (auto& item : collection) {} // mutating