Wouldn't the closed processes and underlying data severely limit communities such as OSM from using Overture Maps results for anything other than a validation o

Wouldn't the closed processes and underlying data severely limit communities such as OSM from using Overture Maps results for anything other than a validation of what OSM already knows from other sources? Perhaps Overture Maps has used impressively accurate satellite imagery tracing to detect the demolition and rebuild of a structure somewhere in Sudan, and can output a new polygon. No OSM mapper is setting foot in Sudan, and recent satellite imagery for the area is not available through companies that share such data for OSM use. The issue for an OSM mapper who sees the conflict between OSM (with the old building) and Overture Maps (with the new building) is they don't have any information to know which result is accurate. Is OSM just out of date? Has Overture Maps produced the result from outdated satellite imagery and OSM is more up-to-date? Is the result form Overture Maps the result of a mistake in an automated tracing algorithm?