3 ms·
But my point is why is that the alternative? Why am I training my AI on anonymous jobbing actors whom I have to pay per use, instead of any old anonymous genera
by OJFord 3y ago
But my point is why is that the alternative? Why am I training my AI on anonymous jobbing actors whom I have to pay per use, instead of any old anonymous generative face? There are already film trailer-esque videos of 'people' generated by Midjourney or similar, and then some other image->video processor, on YouTube.
- sb8244 3y agoMaybe they'd strike for that to not happen. Actors will be involved in 99.9% of productions, and people will always be involved. Are they in union with those actors?
- OJFord 3y agoThey should strike to be paid twice when stunt or likeness (for 'clone' type scenes) doubles are in use too. I don't think it's at all obvious a significant number of the rest would care never mind want to strike on their behalf. We're not even talking just about properly famous 'made it' actors, we're talking about anyone with a speaking part, or just more of an obvious or interactive role... It'd be like software engineers (from nobody in particular like me, to big recognisable names) striking over office cleaners' fear they're being replaced with Roombas.