3 ms·
I don’t think they need your likeness for an extra. They can just create an army of AI extras and use them without paying for anyone’s likeness. That’s my unde
by creeble 3y ago
I don’t think they need your likeness for an extra. They can just create an army of AI extras and use them without paying for anyone’s likeness.
That’s my understanding of the strike anyway.
- anigbrowl 3y agoAI extras are not that great, or studios/production companies wouldn't be trying to get full scans of background actors.
- mrguyorama 3y agoAnd that has been done before (pretty much any movie with a crowd just duplicates extras or invents people) but these background, not famous actors, who do a lot of work that people don't seem to realize in order to make a movie feel more real, get paid average worker wages, which is fine. But film companies were requesting jobs that included "we take a comprehensive copy of your likeness as an 'AI' whatever, and pay you for ONE DAY of work, and then instead of hiring you we just use that likeness in perpetuity, for the rest of time, and you don't get a dime for it" That just doesn't make any sense IMO. It would be equivalent to a song writer training a LLM on just a single artist's songs and refusing to pay any sort of licensing or royalty.
- djbusby 3y agoLike the Orc army in the LOTR movies?