4 ms·
No it doesn't. It claims overfishing in many areas. Not a decline in lobster.
by zosima 3y ago
No it doesn't. It claims overfishing in many areas. Not a decline in lobster.
- sudhirc 3y agoSeems like I am confused. Are you saying decline due to over fishing is acceptable? Doesn't that contradicts unlimited abundance argument?
- zosima 3y agoYes, your reply seems a bit disoriented. Overlobstering is a despicable habit which should be stopped wherever it's happening. It's just neither driving lobsters status as a luxury good, nor is it significantly affecting the amount of lobster.