3 ms·
Yeah, Chinese characters radicals are not an alphabet per se, while Hangul has separate, standalone letters. It's literally a matter of composing them in a fixe
by qalmakka 3y ago
Yeah, Chinese characters radicals are not an alphabet per se, while Hangul has separate, standalone letters. It's literally a matter of composing them in a fixed way, compared to Chinese characters which tend to go bananas on how many thousands of ways they can be composed.
- gumby 3y agoYeah, in case my message wasn't clear: my comment about the radicals was in support of encoding precomposed characters.