> The only reason Firefox exists is because Google wants something they can point to in court and say "look! we're not a monopoly!" A competitor that survives

> The only reason Firefox exists is because Google wants something they can point to in court and say "look! we're not a monopoly!" A competitor that survives at the charity of a monopoly is evidence of a monopoly, not evidence of the opposite. A court might see a non-profit that is directly dependent on Google for ongoing operating cash very differently that how it saw Gates' one-time personal investment in Apple.