> philosophy has such a meagre empirical record So they re-hash the same arguments with an equal lack of data and come to the same conclusions with equally dub

> philosophy has such a meagre empirical record So they re-hash the same arguments with an equal lack of data and come to the same conclusions with equally dubious applications. It’s not so bad when it’s just randos posting in internet forums, but now we’re seeing people with real influence leaping from unfounded premises to untestable conclusions with unswerving confidence.