Many comments here seem to suggest that practically it is going to be impossible to classify text as Human generated versus AI generated -- given the many diffe

Many comments here seem to suggest that practically it is going to be impossible to classify text as Human generated versus AI generated -- given the many different ways in which such attempts can be foiled in a never ending game of cat-and-mouse. If we accept this ... The challenge I am foreseeing is this: We are only at the very beginning of the AI revolution -- and if LLMs need to get more sophisticated and powerful in future they will need good-quality human-generated / curated training data at a scale that is likely impossible to do manual curation/cleansing/quality-checks on. And there is no doubt that evey medium is going to get bombarded and spammed with AI-generated content in coming years. How then, are we going to filter the data -- to separate the real data from AI generated noise -- to train future LLMs on -- and really push them to their potential. This problem has been bugging me for a while and I commented here previously as well, tentatively calling it 'Data Pollution' for the lack of a better word. Curious to hear other perspectives on this.