"Fair" does not mean "central, between horrible and tolerable". >That's obviously not feasible Your curt dismissal belies that it's actually not just feasible

"Fair" does not mean "central, between horrible and tolerable". >That's obviously not feasible Your curt dismissal belies that it's actually not just feasible, but a necessity. I would like to see UPS spend the money to replace/retrofit, rather than fighting lawsuits from the relatives of dead or disabled workers, only to have to replace/retrofit anyway.