4 ms·
I'm not sure I'm reading you right--you're suggesting it should work this way? When content republished on some bizarre/sketchy/unaccountable ~adfarm outranks
by abathur 3y ago
I'm not sure I'm reading you right--you're suggesting it should work this way?
When content republished on some bizarre/sketchy/unaccountable ~adfarm outranks the site where it first appeared, users of Google's search service end up at higher risk of getting phished or infected with malware.
Is there some benefit you see here that outweighs this downside risk?
- hinkley 3y agoApplying SEO to a copy of someone else's content gets you highly ranked on Google. I'm saying that at this point Google is doing enough processing that they should be able to detect duplicates after a fashion, and weight the oldest copy more heavily than duplicates.