4 ms·
>As far as I know, that’s possible with permanent magnets (and it would be weird, but not impossible, if the group instead synthesized a novel ferromagnet and d
by colechristensen 3y ago
>As far as I know, that’s possible with permanent magnets (and it would be weird, but not impossible, if the group instead synthesized a novel ferromagnet and didn’t notice)
As far as I know a stable arrangement of permanent magnets levitating is impossible without a baring surface to keep them aligned. (i.e. free floating levitation is not possible without active control)
- floxy 3y agoJust so everyone is on the same page, static passive diamagnetic levitation is possible with materials like pyrolytic graphite. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetism https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=diamagnetic-levitation https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=diamagnetic-levitatio... ...and superconductors are usually perfectly diamagnetic.
- colechristensen 3y agoEvery substance is one of * ferromagnetic - attracted to one pole of a magnet but not the other (in a given orientation), this is what everybody thinks of when they think of "magnets" * paramagnetic - attracted to both poles, i.e. stuff that sticks to magnets * diamagnetic - repelled by both poles, except in superconductors, this effect is very weak compared to the forces experienced involving ferro-ferro or fero-paramagnetic materials. There isn't another category, everything fits in to one of those buckets. Saying >Just so everyone is on the same page, static passive diamagnetic levitation is possible with materials like pyrolytic graphite. is a bit deceptive, as what people know as "magnetic" materials are ferromagnetic.
- CMScientist 3y agoYou literally missed the most common magnetic phase - antiferromagnetism
- jacquesm 3y agoThat's not quite true. There is a Halbach array with a bunch of compensation coils that will nicely center as long as it is moving, no active control or bearing required. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304885311001181 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03048... And many others besides. Halbach arrays are fascinating.
- floxy 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnshaw%27s_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnshaw%27s_theorem
- jacquesm 3y agostationary. Hence the 'as long as it is moving' bit above. Because the motion allows for the coils to generate enough of a current to drive the compensation. So you need a support system to bring the assembly up to a certain minimum speed above which it will stably levitate.
- floxy 3y agoRight. Everyone should just read up on Earnshaw's theorem to know what all the boundary conditions are. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitron https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitron
- jacquesm 3y agoI wonder how long you could get one of those to spin in a vacuum. Halbach arrays with compensating coils have been proposed for some interesting applications, such as low loss flywheels for electrical storage. I don't know if that ever got commercialized but I do recall that some prototypes were made by a US company. I can't find a reference to it though.
- floxy 3y ago>I wonder how long you could get one of those to spin in a vacuum. Not too much longer apparently... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn7IedCgva0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn7IedCgva0