I don't think thats really a better title. It gives the impression that the reduction is less than the impact of people quitting. I get where you are going, bu

I don't think thats really a better title. It gives the impression that the reduction is less than the impact of people quitting. I get where you are going, but this doesn't communicate it well. It would be better to somehow tie it into taxes or something if we want to go down that path. Or maybe say something like "If all smokers quit it could save Medicaid 45% of its budget". Saying the same thing but I feel like putting 0.45% next to 1% leads to a gut reaction (since the savings is smaller than the amount of people stopping smoking) that does not properly communicate what is being said.