Agreed. Also I'm not here to defend their particular model. Just saying that "physical" does not always equal "better predictions". Their model equation (1) ha

Agreed. Also I'm not here to defend their particular model. Just saying that "physical" does not always equal "better predictions". Their model equation (1) has 4 parameters. Do you have any papers at hand that model AMOC in a more physically constrained way, with a similar number of tunable parameters?