4 ms·
I think there's a middle ground between 'at-will employment capitalist hellscape' America and 'unable to be fired for months socialist hellscape' Europe.
by johneth 3y ago
I think there's a middle ground between 'at-will employment capitalist hellscape' America and 'unable to be fired for months socialist hellscape' Europe.
- unmole 3y agoWhat does labour regulation have to to do with socialism?
- johneth 3y agoI'm being hyperbolic, using the American bastardisation of the word 'socialism'. I'd put myself on the Europe-side of employment law/regulation ideals.
- Paul-Craft 3y agoThere are no socialist countries in Europe. Every country in Europe is capitalist.
- FredPret 3y agoIt's probably helpful to point out neither is in any way close to being a hellscape, and the people in both places have done a wonderful job building up a civilization that suits them.
- tambourine_man 3y agoEurope is much more of a middle ground than the opposite end of the spectrum.
- switch007 3y ago> 'unable to be fired for months socialist hellscape' Europe A small handful of countries in Europe*
- nmfisher 3y agoGenerally I've always found the underlying principle behind the Australian system[0] to be a reasonable middle ground. Those making less than a certain amount can only be terminated: a) immediately for cause (theft/fraud/etc) b) with notice for poor performance c) with notice and a legislated payout for redundancy where the job is no longer required. Those earning above a certain amount need to negotiate any/all of these into their contract. Admittedly it does occasionally result in employees being reinstated whose sacking was (IMO) completely justified. I don't like those specific instances, but I figure it's the price you have to pay for a system that is tilted slightly in favour of employees. [0] The actual laws are rubbish though, they're intentionally obtuse/vague owing to industrial relations being a political minefield and no government wanting to touch it for fear of voter pushback.