6 ms·
Just played with the sandbox, and it seems like 16% of Apple users wouldn't consider buying Apple VR headset even for $3,5. I don't think even the lochness mons
by golergka 3y ago
Just played with the sandbox, and it seems like 16% of Apple users wouldn't consider buying Apple VR headset even for $3,5. I don't think even the lochness monster would be so stingy.
- timshell 3y agoOne of our major weaknesses right now is sensitivity to price
- coderintherye 3y agoIn a world where everyone could buy the headset for $3.50 (thus there is no profit value to buying it and then re-selling it) then that percentage actually makes sense.
- sebzim4500 3y agoPresumably the question is being interpreted as "would you buy a Apple VR headset if the standard price was $3.50?", rather than "would you buy a headset for $3.50 that you could immediately resell for 1000x that?". The answer seems plausible with that interpretation.
- golergka 3y agoDon't you think that even playing with it for an hour and then never touching it again would still be worth a three fiddy?
- sebzim4500 3y agoI do but I can imagine that 16% of people don't. If you went out with a VR headset and offered 30 minute demos of them to random people for $3.50 I don't think you would have an 84% success rate.
- ahzhou 3y agoFWIW, I think the discussion here this highlights the biggest problem with the approach. Either it's confirmatory and wasn't a question worth asking in the first place or it's surprising and people need real data to evaluate the response.