4 ms·
The publication is in Nature Communications, which is a bit of a different (lesser) beast than Nature.
by gwerbret 3y ago
The publication is in Nature Communications, which is a bit of a different (lesser) beast than Nature.
- braaannigan 3y agoThanks for pointing this out, I missed that
- CamperBob2 3y agoThis is becoming a perennial refrain in HN stories based on scientific papers. ("Oh, wait, this dubious study or lazy meta-analysis isn't really appearing in Nature, it's some other publication to which Nature has whored out their name and credibility.") It sounds like the 150-year-old scientific journal of record has been taken over by private equity, or by MBAs with KPIs to optimize.
- boondoggle16 3y agoVery very poignant comment here.
- hackerzzzz 3y agoHackers news literally exists to perform lazy meta analysis
- hackzzz 3y ago[flagged]
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 3y agoSorry, Nature can't try to pull the Buzzfeed/Buzzfeed News schtick. They can't have a clickbait journal where they use their name to lend it credibility it would otherwise not have, and then claim no this isn't "Nature" and try to keep their credibility.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoLike TedX diluted TED.