3 ms·
This may be the wrong way around. If the example use case is that a colleague asks how something works and I respond via Slack with Prosona, shouldn't they hav
by stitched2gethr 3y ago
This may be the wrong way around. If the example use case is that a colleague asks how something works and I respond via Slack with Prosona, shouldn't they have just asked Prosona or something like it? Why am I in the loop now? If they need a status update, how will Prosona have access to information which is not in my head, but also not accessible to my colleague?
I do appreciate exploration of AI in different settings, but I feel like any tool that only works in one of my screens isn't going to be what wins 10 years down the line.
- hgunasekara 3y agoGreat question! We realized documentation will always be patchy and imperfect which is why we put you in the loop so that you can provide extra context. There will always be information in your head that is not written down and we streamline your ability to disseminate that information. It also means there is accountability in the case where the question is used to make a decision. This launch is only the first step for us. In the future, edits you make to the response could be used to update upstream documents making the hive mind even more connected.