3 ms·

First time I read about it, so also the actual QI wireless charging should increase the atmospheric heat? Anyway the current wireless charging is less efficien

First time I read about it, so also the actual QI wireless charging should increase the atmospheric heat? Anyway the current wireless charging is less efficient, and the “dispersed” power is transformed into heat, so yes, it’s always less environment friendly. The numbers of dispersed power are very small but on a very big scale.

westurner 3y ago
Space-based solar power > Safety: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power#Safety https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power#Safety : > At the Earth's surface, a suggested microwave beam would have a maximum intensity at its center, of 23 mW/cm2 (less than 1/4 the solar irradiation constant), and an intensity of less than 1 mW/cm2 outside the rectenna fenceline (the receiver's perimeter).[91] These compare with current United States Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) workplace exposure limits for microwaves, which are 10 mW/cm2 If the beam intensity is lower than than the solar irradiation constant, what is the advantage over terrestrial solar/TPV? I think that intensity could heat a metal object? Is all of the inefficiency of wireless power transfer systems due to thermal conversion/loss?