2 ms·
Governments already have systems to identify who is a citizen. You can't Sybil attack birth certificates and naturalization paperwork because they're issued by
by kmeisthax 3y ago
Governments already have systems to identify who is a citizen. You can't Sybil attack birth certificates and naturalization paperwork because they're issued by a trustworthy entity[0]. Worldcoin is trying to reinvent ID cards for the sake of... IDK, becoming some kind of ancap alternative to a state bureaucracy?
Also, not everyone is going to accept UBI as a substitute for labor. We already see artists complaining specifically that AI art takes away the fun part of the job. The entire LessWrong/EA memeplex[1] assumes that the benefits of AI will be so obvious that humanity will tolerate the imposition of a new technological priesthood responsible for aligning AI to humanity's collective interests. Worship us and we will make Star Trek a documentary. This is like if you took all the worst parts of Christianity and all the worst parts of authoritarian Soviet Communism and mashed them up in a blender.
[0] Bracing for the inevitable UHM ACKTUALLY comments about ballot stuffing in third world countries
[1] Short for MEME comPLEX. A series of ideas that tend to be adopted together because they are self-reinforcing.
- neolefty 3y agoThe ideal government would be the ideal partner — unfortunately the governments of the world are far from ideal. So I can understand why you'd want to circumvent them. But in the end, we do need government, and circumventing them just means eventually needing to re-create them. Which leads to the question: Do we fix the governments we have, or create new ones? It seems analagous to the rewrite-from-scratch fallacy. In the end, I can't see any way around fixing the world's governments. Educating the electorate, structural reform, all of it. So yeah. Currency and UBI seem like functions of governments to me too.
- onetokeoverthe 3y ago[dead]