3 ms·
Good read. This is so true, by the way, the importance getting a proof-of-principle of some end-to-end multi-step process. I've sometimes described this as a br
by KineticLensman 3y ago
Good read. This is so true, by the way, the importance getting a proof-of-principle of some end-to-end multi-step process. I've sometimes described this as a breadth-first solution, which often makes sense to generic business types.
- falcor84 3y agoSorry, wouldn't this approach of going all the way to the end, while ignoring as much as you can on the way, actually be a depth-first solution?
- xboxnolifes 3y agoI think the idea is that they didn't ignore as much as you can along the way. They spent a lot of time on each of their foundations, completing (to some degree) each layer before moving onto the next. > It had passed through our new modeling tools, through two different intermediate converter programs, had been loaded up as a complete database, and been rendered through a fairly complex scene hierarchy, fully textured and lit They didn't do the bare minimum modeling without tooling, didn't hack together (or avoid making) barely enough converter programs, they didn't hack together an in-memory database as a prototype, and they didn't do the bare minimum rendering to show a triangle. They built out a fully working system, layer by layer, the entire breadth of each layer, until they got to the rendering and display layers. At the end of it, they got a triangle. But, since they put in all of the effort to build a strong foundation, the second triangle is 1000x easier to make than the first.