4 ms·
> There is no way you can make a viable passenger route between Chicago and LA; the distance is just way too large. This is like arguing that the Trans-Siberia
by aleph_minus_one 3y ago
> There is no way you can make a viable passenger route between Chicago and LA; the distance is just way too large.
This is like arguing that the Trans-Siberian Railway is not viable because the distance is just way too large: the Trans-Siberian Railway is not even a high-speed railway.
- kneebonian 3y agoThe Trans-Siberian railway is about being able to move things from the Asian ports in the far east to the population centers in the far west. It has everything to do with a strategic defense decision by Russia, and was commissioned in an effort to allow imperialist Russia to wage war. To compare the Trans-Siberian Railway that is primarily used for freight to a passenger line from Chicago to LA is comparing apples and oranges.
- selectodude 3y agoIt’s not viable. The United States is too wealthy for passengers to waste days on a train. They’ll simply fly in 4 hours. Furthermore, that Chicago to Los Angeles train already exists and runs daily.
- mthamil 3y agoThis is the perspective of someone who doesn't understand how most people in the US live. Air travel is not affordable for many people.
- zimzam 3y agoAir travel is usually cheaper than Amtrak though. To travel from NYC to Chicago on Aug. 21st: Flight: $124 nonstop (2hr 40 min) or $85 with layover (7 hours) Greyhound (bus): $170 (23.5 hours) Amtrak: $144 (19.5 hours) If you value your time and/or your money the flights usually win