> It seems like chicken is better than fish is wayyy better than red meat. You're right, but only if you count carbon footprint. You also have to count in dest

> It seems like chicken is better than fish is wayyy better than red meat. You're right, but only if you count carbon footprint. You also have to count in destroyed/damaged/polluted ecosystems, elimination of wildlife, deforestation, energy, etc. etc. if you WANT to have a complete picture. For CO2 numbers, you can see the original study Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325532198_Reducing_food%27s_environmental_impacts_through_producers_and_consumers https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325532198_Reducing_... or the graph listing more kinds of meats here: Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/31/avoiding-meat-and-dairy-is-single-biggest-way-to-reduce-your-impact-on-earth https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/31/avoiding...