4 ms·
The only time I hear this is when people refer to it. I've yet to find examples of it myself, bearing in mind that companies choosing what can and can't be said
by komali2 3y ago
The only time I hear this is when people refer to it. I've yet to find examples of it myself, bearing in mind that companies choosing what can and can't be said on their platforms doesn't constitute censorship (unless we're willing to admit that platforms have a monopoly on public communication).
- mc32 3y agoWhen you have Federal embeds counselling companies on content, that's essentially censorship. I don't know what else you'd call it. That's banana republic level technique and tactics. This is something a Francisco Franco might have done. No, no, we don't have censors, we're just making sure only the truth of the moment is published. And of course, blackhole all the contradictions.
- komali2 3y ago> only the truth of the moment is published What other truths are you struggling to publish? What contradictions do you have that you're unable to display anywhere? > Federal embeds counselling companies on content What's this? I haven't heard about it.
- kelnos 3y agoIt absolutely is censorship. Whether or not that censorship is illegal depends on who is doing the censorship. But the act of suppressing speech is censorship, no matter who does it.
- komali2 3y agoI don't understand - you're not allowed to submit blog posts to my blog, am I censoring you?