3 ms·
That was my first thought too. Perhaps companies can't easily differentiate between cases of stolen identity and cases where a bad actor claims their identity w
by nomilk 3y ago
That was my first thought too. Perhaps companies can't easily differentiate between cases of stolen identity and cases where a bad actor claims their identity was stolen.
- ganoushoreilly 3y agoMaybe I misread but if they were Exparte, were they implying she wasn't there and it's possible all these verdicts were handed down without any of her input? In that case the companies may not / wouldn't know? Either way still a horrible situation.
- staticautomatic 3y agoEx parte just means it’s an emergency and you need the court to move fast
- bbatsell 3y agoNo, ex parte means not requiring a party that would normally be required. It is _also_ used in emergencies because the process of pleadings, answers, and replies would be too slow, so you are asking the court to temporarily ignore the rule that the other party respond before the court issues some sort of order or response.
- staticautomatic 3y agoYou still have to argue your way out of notice.