4 ms·
“There is a tension between utility for anti-fraud use cases requiring deterministic verdicts and high coverage, and the risk of websites using this functionali
by cobbzilla 3y ago
“There is a tension between utility for anti-fraud use cases requiring deterministic verdicts and high coverage, and the risk of websites using this functionality to exclude specific attesters or non-attestable browsers. We look forward to discussion on this topic, and acknowledge the significant value-add even in the case where verdicts are not deterministically available (e.g. holdouts).”
See, don’t worry, they’re thinking about you, holdout.
- userbinator 3y agoWe look forward to discussion on this topic Also known as "we'll read what the opponents say, and keep trying to poke them with convincing-sounding arguments until they surrender."