4 ms·
Is 20 or 70 years ago the baseline for all of human history? Does that represent how many men are "supposed" to be sexless? I'm not saying there isn't more or
by faeriechangling 3y ago
Is 20 or 70 years ago the baseline for all of human history? Does that represent how many men are "supposed" to be sexless?
I'm not saying there isn't more or less of an issue with sexlessness in certain ages, or regions, or cultures. I'm just saying that Incel's are an inevitability in every generation.
>Even my own experience, taking a bus to work filled with 250k FAANG engineers, ide bet 80-90% of them are virgins or sexless.
Look at the gender demographics in the areas where 250k FAANG engineers work. Honestly I'm not sure if those are truly Incel's or those are people who value money more than love, I know men making well under 100k full remote who are not that attractive who pull plenty because they moved to where they're high value on the dating market.
- Racing0461 3y ago> 70 years ago the baseline for all of human history IMHO from a intersexual dynamics point of view, yes. (Invention of the birth control pill, abortion being legalized, no fault divorce, feminism, social media) all together was pretty much an inflection point. Things didn't change much before that sexually.
- cbozeman 3y ago60%. 60% of men are supposed to be sexless. The reason we know this is because all of humanity descended from only 40% of the men to have ever lived. The rest might have had sex, but they never fathered children. Most men have died in warfare or to disease or starvation or being trampled by a woolly mammoth or were just plain "not good enough" for women. 80% of women have a living descendant today. And all this proves is what every "manosphere" personality jabbers on about nonstop... women are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of relationships. We're just getting back closer to nature is all, and it's about to get worse as opposed to better.