4 ms·
> All of that with the cost of only doubling the amount of solar cells Why should that change if vastly is the correct adjective or not? If I overpaid by a fac
by wnevets 3y ago
> All of that with the cost of only doubling the amount of solar cells
Why should that change if vastly is the correct adjective or not? If I overpaid by a factor of 10 to be 20% taller I would still be vastly taller, regardless of how much I paid.
- spywaregorilla 3y agoAdult male height mean is 70 inches. Standard deviation is 3 inches. A 20% increase is 4.67 standard deviations above the mean, which is sensibly describable as a vast improvement in terms of human height. But your statement about "vast" for height is only true because of the particular distribution. It doesn't generalize.
- wnevets 3y ago> Adult male height mean is 70 inches. Standard deviation is 3 inches. If I was 20% taller I would be well over 7ft tall. > because of the particular distribution. It doesn't generalize. and IMO it fits solar electricity production increases.
- spywaregorilla 3y ago> If I was 20% taller I would be well over 7ft tall. ok? > and IMO it fits solar electricity production increases. I think it's distracting more than anything. We can, at best, debate whether the distribution of power generation is similar to the distribution of height to get any usefulness of out of this.
- wnevets 3y ago> debate whether the distribution of power generation is similar to the distribution of height to get any usefulness of out of this. and IMO they are, thus my original comment.