3 ms·
It's hard to tell but, you seem to be implying that you think pro-gas stove talking points seem to be fake. To be perfectly honest _both_ sides of that argument
by MostlyStable 3y ago
It's hard to tell but, you seem to be implying that you think pro-gas stove talking points seem to be fake. To be perfectly honest _both_ sides of that argument seem to be "generated from outrage-tuned talking points". The loudest people from both perspectives are obnoxious and full of it and the whole thing seems to be a stupid waste of attention.
- mturmon 3y agoI'd say that many of the pro-gas-stove talking points seem exaggerated (i.e., some pro-gas points are true in some senses, but induction stoves do exist and address essentially all of these concerns -- that's the "novel technology" I mentioned). And more so, the pro-gas side seems to be funded and organized in a coordinated way. Yes, it's generally a waste of attention.