2 ms·

It’s not just that it didn’t meet the standards of today; it didn’t even meet the cost-efficiency goals it was originally intended to.

• mulmen 3y ago
  It met the capability requirements though. Including reusability.
  • philwelch 3y ago
    I’m not going to continue to engage because you don’t seem to be engaging in good faith here.
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • mulmen 3y ago
      If you can't engage constructively then that is probably for the best. But you should reevaluate your assessment because you have come to an incorrect conclusion.
      • philwelch 3y ago
        I have engaged constructively this whole time, and you've downvoted every comment of mine you could. (HN doesn't allow you to downvote direct replies to your own comments, and those are the only comments of mine that aren't downvoted, so it's easy to tell.) That indicates bad faith.