6 ms·
You wrote now "no where did I profess; "likely."" Your original text contained this line: "The above is why Pyrex cookware is likely to crack and split in micr
by eesmith 3y ago
You wrote now "no where did I profess; "likely.""
Your original text contained this line: "The above is why Pyrex cookware is likely to crack and split in microwave cooking". I've emphasized where you wrote "likely", which you can verify at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36839086 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36839086 .
Your Pyrex cookware is NOT likely to crack in split in microwave cooking, as I earlier stated at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36839452 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36839452 .
> it is hotter than ambient temperature, microwave energy has been absorbed across the large surface area.
Sure. Agreed. That's why I wrote "the glass will heat up faster than otherwise" with emphasis added to show how I know the glass will heat up no matter its composition.
Put your 1.75QT - 1.65L Pyrex cookware in the microwave, by itself, and it will also heat up. That's not a sign that there is some special additive.
You think the glass turntable contains a metal additive which absorbs energy. This means it will get hotter than glass without the additive. Where is your evidence that it is designed this way?
- archo 3y ago>Where is your evidence that it is designed this way? < You can find the reference that the platen forms a dummy-load. I could explain to you how and why this happens, but I doubt you would " believe ", even if the facts are placed in front of your face. Hence further dialog is moot.
- eesmith 3y agoBoring bluster. I link to my citations, including to the patent literature, and you ... have nothing to back you up.