4 ms·
For quantum-ness, see perhaps "Causality and radioactive decay": * https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radioactive-decay.html https://edward
by throw0101a 3y ago
For quantum-ness, see perhaps "Causality and radioactive decay":
* https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radioactive-decay.html https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radio...
The book Aristotle's Revenge has "§5.2 Aristotle and quantum mechanics" as well per the table of contents (been a few years since I read it):
* https://www.editiones-scholasticae.de/artikel/aristotles-revenge/ https://www.editiones-scholasticae.de/artikel/aristotles-rev...
* https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43277412 https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/43277412
- vacuity 3y agoWhile that's an impressive article, it seems to only prove, if it indeed proves anything, that science can't disprove the existence of God. It must be said that nothing can prove or disprove the existence of God, so the fact that the article doesn't seem to try either way is adequate. There are various things in the Bible that could theoretically be proved or disproved, but God is necessarily beyond our capabilities to truly know. Only in maths are there proofs. We're glorified frogs in wells. Whether or not God exists, religious people see fit to mesh their moral axioms with their understanding of God's teachings. Atheists suppose no such being to base their moral axioms on. To each their own, but those who find others intolerable will be hostile. We are humans living in a world we have created for ourselves.