5 ms·
The bird is a lot more recognizable, no? Maybe even beautiful?
by dietrichepp 3y ago
The bird is a lot more recognizable, no? Maybe even beautiful?
- booleandilemma 3y agoI thought the same thing. The bird is endearing. Changing it to X is something some edgy teenager would do. I can't help but wonder if he's trying to destroy twitter on purpose.
- solardev 3y agoThis whole Twitter saga is like what happens when a cat catches a bird and doesn't know what to do with it so just slowly tortures it to death for the hell of it
- NoNotTheDuo 3y agoNot only the bird, but all of the associated verbiage. For example, Tweet and Retweet. Do those go away after changing the name and logo?
- solardev 3y agoYeah lol, Musk wants to call them xs now. Like "your x last night was pretty great" or "will you share your x with me again?" Not even kidding. https://apnews.com/article/twitter-x-logo-blue-bird-musk-0689e9a5c3a217afc2fbefeaf0e6d8a8 https://apnews.com/article/twitter-x-logo-blue-bird-musk-068... > In response to questions about what tweets would be called when the rebranding is done, Musk said they would be called Xs.
- account42 3y agoBy coincidence, a lot of people I know have already been calling them twats.
- brazzledazzle 3y agoClearly none of the marketing or branding people stayed on. Or he ignores them.
- treve 3y agoI imagine the former will become xcrete.
- simplicio 3y agoAlso people less likely to assume its the brand for a pornography site? Feel like people have developed a habit of avoiding (or seeking out) anything with a prominent "X" in the name on the Internets.
- yurodivuie 3y agoIt sounds like Elon had the domain and it was burning a hole in his pocket. That's the only explanation, honestly. Twitter as a brand becomes less valuable the more he alters it, since he's such a polarizing figure, so changing the brand to break continuity seems pretty counterproductive. It just reminds people that Elon is still fiddling with it.
- kergonath 3y ago> It sounds like Elon had the domain and it was burning a hole in his pocket. That's the only explanation, honestly. I think he just thinks he’s getting his revenge and that everyone will see how his terrible idea of x.com was actually genius back in the day. Like a particularly expensive midlife crisis. A bit like some dudes who start playing guitar because they could not back in the day, when it was a useful tool to make friends and look cool.
- nerdbert 3y ago> It sounds like Elon had the domain and it was burning a hole in his pocket. Yeah I wonder if he "sold" it to Twitter, and if so, for how much.
- kergonath 3y agoYeah, but not kewl enough.